|Benefit-Cost Summary Statistics Per Participant|
|Taxpayers||$2,412||Benefits minus costs||$1,250|
|Participants||$5,337||Benefit to cost ratio||$1.29|
|Others||$0||Chance the program will produce|
|Indirect||($2,124)||benefits greater than the costs||55 %|
|Net program cost||($4,375)|
|Benefits minus cost||$1,250|
|Meta-Analysis of Program Effects|
|Outcomes measured||Treatment age||No. of effect sizes||Treatment N||Adjusted effect sizes(ES) and standard errors(SE) used in the benefit - cost analysis||Unadjusted effect size (random effects model)|
|First time ES is estimated||Second time ES is estimated|
Percent change in labor market earnings, typically weekly or monthly wages.
Any employment, including part-time work.
Receipt of food assistance, such as from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP).
Any form of welfare assistance, such as Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) or Assistance for Families with Dependent Children (AFDC).
|Detailed Monetary Benefit Estimates Per Participant|
|Affected outcome:||Resulting benefits:1||Benefits accrue to:|
|Public assistance||Public assistance||$157||($57)||$0||$79||$178|
|Earnings||Labor market earnings||$2,285||$5,368||$0||$0||$7,653|
|Food assistance||Food assistance||($31)||$27||$0||($15)||($19)|
|Program cost||Adjustment for deadweight cost of program||$0||$0||$0||($2,187)||($2,187)|
|Detailed Annual Cost Estimates Per Participant|
|Annual cost||Year dollars||Summary|
|Program costs||$4,102||2014||Present value of net program costs (in 2018 dollars)||($4,375)|
|Comparison costs||$0||2014||Cost range (+ or -)||66 %|
Benefits Minus Costs
Benefits by Perspective
Taxpayer Benefits by Source of Value
|Benefits Minus Costs Over Time (Cumulative Discounted Dollars)|
|The graph above illustrates the estimated cumulative net benefits per-participant for the first fifty years beyond the initial investment in the program. We present these cash flows in discounted dollars. If the dollars are negative (bars below $0 line), the cumulative benefits do not outweigh the cost of the program up to that point in time. The program breaks even when the dollars reach $0. At this point, the total benefits to participants, taxpayers, and others, are equal to the cost of the program. If the dollars are above $0, the benefits of the program exceed the initial investment.|
Bloom, H.S. (1990). Back to work: Testing reemployment services for displaced workers. Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
Corson, W., & Haimson, J. (1996). The New Jersey Unemployment Insurance Reemployment Demonstration Project: Six-year followup and summary report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration, Unemployment Insurance Service.
Decker, P.T., & Thornton, C.V. (1995). The long-term effects of transitional employment services. Social Security Bulletin, 58(4), 71-81.
Decker, P.T., Olsen, R.B., Freeman, L., & Klepinger, D.H. (2000). Assisting Unemployment Insurance claimants: The long-term impacts of the Job Search Assistance Demonstration. U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration, Unemployment Insurance Service.
Hollenbeck, K., & Huang, W.-J. (2003). Net impact and benefit-cost estimates of the workforce development system in Washington State. Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
Hollenbeck, K. (2009). Return on investment analysis of a selected set of workforce system programs in Indiana. Indianapolis, IN: Report submitted to the Indiana Chamber of Commerce Foundation.
Maguire, S., Freely, J., Clymer, C., Conway, M., & Schwartz, D. (2010). Tuning in to local labor markets: Findings from the Sectoral Employment Impact Study. Philadelphia, PA: Public/Private Ventures.
Miller, C., & Knox, V.W. (2001). The challenge of helping low-income fathers support their children: Final lessons from Parents' Fair Share. New York, NY: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.
Mueser, P.R., Troske, K.R., & Gorislavsky, A. (2007). Using state administrative data to measure program performance. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(4), 761-783.
Orr, L.L., Bloom, H.S., Bell, S.H., Doolittle, F., Lin, W., & Cave, G. (1996). Does training for the disadvantaged work? Evidence from the National JTPA Study. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
Schochet, P.Z., D'Amico, R., Berk, J., Dolfin, S., & Wozny, N. (2012). Estimated impacts for participants in the Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) Program under the 2002 amendments: Final report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration.