skip to main content
Washington State Institute for Public Policy
Back Button

Injectable naltrexone for opioid use disorder for adults post-release

Adult Criminal Justice
Benefit-cost methods last updated December 2019.  Literature review updated March 2021.
Open PDF
Extended-release injectable naltrexone is an opiate antagonist used to treat opiate use disorder. Naltrexone blocks the euphoric effects of opiates while preventing patients from developing a tolerance or from experiencing withdrawal symptoms when they stop taking the drug. Ultimately, it is intended to reduce cravings and prevent relapse.

Naltrexone injections are typically administered monthly for 2-6 months. In some cases, patients may also receive counseling therapies such as cognitive-behavioral treatment or motivational enhancement therapy. Patients in our analysis meet the criteria for opioid dependence and are on some form of criminal justice supervision (either parole or probation) following a release from jail or prison. Patients in the comparison condition receive either a medical placebo or usual treatment (i.e., drug counseling).
 
ALL
BENEFIT-COST
META-ANALYSIS
CITATIONS
For an overview of WSIPP's Benefit-Cost Model, please see this guide. The estimates shown are present value, life cycle benefits and costs. All dollars are expressed in the base year chosen for this analysis (2018). The chance the benefits exceed the costs are derived from a Monte Carlo risk analysis. The details on this, as well as the economic discount rates and other relevant parameters are described in our Technical Documentation.
Benefit-Cost Summary Statistics Per Participant
Benefits to:
Taxpayers $1,083 Benefits minus costs ($20,376)
Participants $280 Benefit to cost ratio ($0.17)
Others $1,743 Chance the program will produce
Indirect ($6,046) benefits greater than the costs 0 %
Total benefits ($2,939)
Net program cost ($17,437)
Benefits minus cost ($20,376)

^WSIPP’s benefit-cost model does not monetize this outcome.

Meta-analysis is a statistical method to combine the results from separate studies on a program, policy, or topic in order to estimate its effect on an outcome. WSIPP systematically evaluates all credible evaluations we can locate on each topic. The outcomes measured are the types of program impacts that were measured in the research literature (for example, crime or educational attainment). Treatment N represents the total number of individuals or units in the treatment group across the included studies.

An effect size (ES) is a standard metric that summarizes the degree to which a program or policy affects a measured outcome. If the effect size is positive, the outcome increases. If the effect size is negative, the outcome decreases. See Estimating Program Effects Using Effect Sizes for additional information.

Adjusted effect sizes are used to calculate the benefits from our benefit cost model. WSIPP may adjust effect sizes based on methodological characteristics of the study. For example, we may adjust effect sizes when a study has a weak research design or when the program developer is involved in the research. The magnitude of these adjustments varies depending on the topic area.

WSIPP may also adjust the second ES measurement. Research shows the magnitude of some effect sizes decrease over time. For those effect sizes, we estimate outcome-based adjustments which we apply between the first time ES is estimated and the second time ES is estimated. We also report the unadjusted effect size to show the effect sizes before any adjustments have been made. More details about these adjustments can be found in our Technical Documentation.

Meta-Analysis of Program Effects
Outcomes measured Treatment age No. of effect sizes Treatment N Adjusted effect sizes(ES) and standard errors(SE) used in the benefit - cost analysis Unadjusted effect size (random effects model)
First time ES is estimated Second time ES is estimated
ES SE Age ES SE Age ES p-value
44 1 153 -0.049 0.364 44 0.000 0.000 45 -0.049 0.893
44 2 169 -0.181 0.207 44 0.000 0.000 45 -0.218 0.294
44 1 153 0.000 0.211 44 n/a n/a n/a 0.000 1.000
44 3 235 -0.316 0.172 44 0.000 0.000 45 -0.441 0.018
44 1 153 -0.047 0.211 44 n/a n/a n/a -0.047 0.825
1In addition to the outcomes measured in the meta-analysis table, WSIPP measures benefits and costs estimated from other outcomes associated with those reported in the evaluation literature. For example, empirical research demonstrates that high school graduation leads to reduced crime. These associated measures provide a more complete picture of the detailed costs and benefits of the program.

2“Others” includes benefits to people other than taxpayers and participants. Depending on the program, it could include reductions in crime victimization, the economic benefits from a more educated workforce, and the benefits from employer-paid health insurance.

3“Indirect benefits” includes estimates of the net changes in the value of a statistical life and net changes in the deadweight costs of taxation.
Detailed Monetary Benefit Estimates Per Participant
Affected outcome: Resulting benefits:1 Benefits accrue to:
Taxpayers Participants Others2 Indirect3 Total
Crime Criminal justice system $685 $0 $1,445 $342 $2,472
Alcohol use disorder Property loss associated with alcohol abuse or dependence $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Opioid use disorder Labor market earnings associated with opioid drug abuse or dependence $76 $178 $0 $0 $254
Health care associated with opioid drug abuse or dependence $297 $42 $298 $148 $785
Mortality associated with opioids $25 $60 $0 $2,182 $2,267
Program cost Adjustment for deadweight cost of program $0 $0 $0 ($8,718) ($8,718)
Totals $1,083 $280 $1,743 ($6,046) ($2,939)
Click here to see populations selected
Detailed Annual Cost Estimates Per Participant
Annual cost Year dollars Summary
Program costs $16,356 2015 Present value of net program costs (in 2018 dollars) ($17,437)
Comparison costs $0 2015 Cost range (+ or -) 20 %
From January to June of 2015, Medicaid in Washington State spent an average of $1,363.03 per patient per month on injectable naltrexone treatment for alcohol and opiate dependence (personal communication with Donna Sullivan at Washington Health Care Authority, 2/4/2016). We assume an average treatment period of 12 months to reflect the time for which we model benefits. We multiply the treatment period by the patient per-month cost to calculate the total per-patient cost of injectable naltrexone treatment.
The figures shown are estimates of the costs to implement programs in Washington. The comparison group costs reflect either no treatment or treatment as usual, depending on how effect sizes were calculated in the meta-analysis. The cost range reported above reflects potential variation or uncertainty in the cost estimate; more detail can be found in our Technical Documentation.
Benefits Minus Costs
Benefits by Perspective
Taxpayer Benefits by Source of Value
Benefits Minus Costs Over Time (Cumulative Discounted Dollars)
The graph above illustrates the estimated cumulative net benefits per-participant for the first fifty years beyond the initial investment in the program. We present these cash flows in discounted dollars. If the dollars are negative (bars below $0 line), the cumulative benefits do not outweigh the cost of the program up to that point in time. The program breaks even when the dollars reach $0. At this point, the total benefits to participants, taxpayers, and others, are equal to the cost of the program. If the dollars are above $0, the benefits of the program exceed the initial investment.

Citations Used in the Meta-Analysis

Lee, J.D., McDonald, R., Grossman, E., McNeely, J., Laska, E., Rotrosen, J., & Gourevitch, M.N. (2015). Opioid treatment at release from jail using extended-release naltrexone: A pilot proof-of-concept randomized effectiveness trial. Addiction, 110(6), 1008-1014.

Lee, J.D., Friedmann, P.D., Kinlock, T.W., Nunes, E.V., Boney, T.Y., Hoskinson, R.A., . . . O’Brien, C.P. (2016). Extended-release naltrexone to prevent opioid relapse in criminal justice offenders. New England Journal of Medicine, 374(13), 1232-1242.

Springer, S.A., Di Paola, A., Azar, M.M., Barbour, R., Biondi, B.E., Desabrais, M., . . . Lincoln, T., (2018). Extended-release Naltrexone improves viral suppression among incarcerated persons living with HIV with opioid use disorders transitioning to the community: Results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 78(1), 43-53.