skip to main content
Washington State Institute for Public Policy
Back Button

Integrated treatment for prodromal psychosis

Adult Mental Health
  Literature review updated September 2016.
Open PDF
Studies in this review examined integrated treatment approaches for help-seeking adolescents and young adults identified as being prodromal, or at high-risk for developing psychosis. The primary purpose of treatment was to prevent or delay onset of psychosis. Integrated treatment lasted between 12 and 24 months. Treatment approaches included several of the following components: assertive community treatment, cognitive behavioral therapy, social skills training, family group psychoeducation, and computer-based cognitive remediation. In this review, integrated treatment is compared with non-specific supportive therapy.
 
ALL
META-ANALYSIS
CITATIONS

Meta-analysis is a statistical method to combine the results from separate studies on a program, policy, or topic in order to estimate its effect on an outcome. WSIPP systematically evaluates all credible evaluations we can locate on each topic. The outcomes measured are the types of program impacts that were measured in the research literature (for example, crime or educational attainment). Treatment N represents the total number of individuals or units in the treatment group across the included studies.

An effect size (ES) is a standard metric that summarizes the degree to which a program or policy affects a measured outcome. If the effect size is positive, the outcome increases. If the effect size is negative, the outcome decreases. See Estimating Program Effects Using Effect Sizes for additional information.

Adjusted effect sizes are used to calculate the benefits from our benefit cost model. WSIPP may adjust effect sizes based on methodological characteristics of the study. For example, we may adjust effect sizes when a study has a weak research design or when the program developer is involved in the research. The magnitude of these adjustments varies depending on the topic area.

WSIPP may also adjust the second ES measurement. Research shows the magnitude of some effect sizes decrease over time. For those effect sizes, we estimate outcome-based adjustments which we apply between the first time ES is estimated and the second time ES is estimated. We also report the unadjusted effect size to show the effect sizes before any adjustments have been made. More details about these adjustments can be found in our Technical Documentation.

Meta-Analysis of Program Effects
Outcomes measured No. of effect sizes Treatment N Adjusted effect size(ES) and standard error(SE) Unadjusted effect size (random effects model)
ES SE Age ES p-value
25 2 105 -0.595 0.276 26 -0.595 0.031

Citations Used in the Meta-Analysis

Bechdolf, A., Wagner, M., Ruhrmann, S., Harrigan, S., Putzfeld, V., Pukrop, R., Brockhaus-Dumke, A., . . . Klosterkötter, J. (2012). Preventing progression to first-episode psychosis in early initial prodromal states. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 200(1), 22-29.

Nordentoft, M., Thorup, A., Petersen, L., Øhlenschlaeger, J., Melau, M., Christensen, T. Ø., . . . Jeppesen, P. (2006). Transition rates from schizotypal disorder to psychotic disorder for first-contact patients included in the OPUS trial. A randomized clinical trial of integrated treatment and standard treatment. Schizophrenia Research, 83(1), 29-40.