ALL |
META-ANALYSIS |
CITATIONS |
|
Meta-Analysis of Program Effects | ||||||||||||
Outcomes measured | No. of effect sizes | Treatment N | Adjusted effect size(ES) and standard error(SE) | Unadjusted effect size (random effects model) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ES | SE | Age | ES | p-value | ||||||||
Externalizing behavior symptoms Symptoms of externalizing behavior (e.g., aggressive, hostile, or disruptive behavior) measured on a validated scale. |
3 | 467 | 0.038 | 0.093 | 14 | 0.091 | 0.330 | |||||
Internalizing symptoms Symptoms of internalizing behavior (e.g., sadness, anxiety, or withdrawal) measured on a validated scale. |
2 | 331 | 0.032 | 0.107 | 13 | 0.032 | 0.768 | |||||
Permanent placement “Final” placement in a permanent home, which can include reunification with parents, formalized guardianships, or legal adoption. |
3 | 509 | -0.064 | 0.100 | 14 | -0.064 | 0.520 | |||||
Placement stability The number of times children in out-of-home care are transferred from one home to another. |
2 | 227 | 0.124 | 0.098 | 14 | 0.124 | 0.208 |
Landsman, M.J., Boel-Studt, S., & Malone, K. (2014). Results from a family finding experiment. Children and Youth Services Review, 36, 62-69.
Leon, S.C., Saucedo, D.J., & Jachymiak, K. (2016). Keeping it in the family: The impact of a Family Finding intervention on placement, permanency, and well-being outcomes. Children and Youth Services Review, 70, 163-170.
Malm, K., Allen, T., Williams, S.C., McKlindon, A.,Vandivere, S. (2013). A rigorous evaluation of family finding in San Francisco. Child Trends.
Malm, K. Vandivere, S., Allen, T., Williams, S.C., McKlindon, A. (2014). A rigorous evaluation of family finding in North Carolina. Child Trends.
Vandivere, S., Malm, K. E., Allen, T. J., Williams, S. C., & McKlindon, A. (2017). A randomized controlled trial of Family Finding: A relative search and engagement intervention for youth lingering in foster care. Evaluation Review.