|Benefit-Cost Summary Statistics Per Participant|
|Taxpayers||$5,132||Benefits minus costs||$9,438|
|Participants||$0||Benefit to cost ratio||$2.82|
|Others||$9,513||Chance the program will produce|
|Indirect||($25)||benefits greater than the costs||100 %|
|Net program cost||($5,182)|
|Benefits minus cost||$9,438|
|Meta-Analysis of Program Effects|
|Outcomes measured||Treatment age||No. of effect sizes||Treatment N||Adjusted effect sizes(ES) and standard errors(SE) used in the benefit - cost analysis||Unadjusted effect size (random effects model)|
|First time ES is estimated||Second time ES is estimated|
Any criminal conviction according to court records, sometimes measured through charges, arrests, incarceration, or self-report.
Any criminal conviction according to court records, sometimes measured through charges, arrests, incarceration, or self-report.
|Detailed Monetary Benefit Estimates Per Participant|
|Affected outcome:||Resulting benefits:1||Benefits accrue to:|
|Crime||Criminal justice system||$5,132||$0||$9,513||$2,566||$17,211|
|Program cost||Adjustment for deadweight cost of program||$0||$0||$0||($2,591)||($2,591)|
|Detailed Annual Cost Estimates Per Participant|
|Annual cost||Year dollars||Summary|
|Program costs||$11,227||2003||Present value of net program costs (in 2018 dollars)||($5,182)|
|Comparison costs||$7,335||2003||Cost range (+ or -)||30 %|
Benefits Minus Costs
Benefits by Perspective
Taxpayer Benefits by Source of Value
|Benefits Minus Costs Over Time (Cumulative Discounted Dollars)|
|The graph above illustrates the estimated cumulative net benefits per-participant for the first fifty years beyond the initial investment in the program. We present these cash flows in discounted dollars. If the dollars are negative (bars below $0 line), the cumulative benefits do not outweigh the cost of the program up to that point in time. The program breaks even when the dollars reach $0. At this point, the total benefits to participants, taxpayers, and others, are equal to the cost of the program. If the dollars are above $0, the benefits of the program exceed the initial investment.|
Barnoski, R., & Aos, S. (2003). Washington State's drug courts for adult defendants: Outcome evaluation and cost-benefit analysis (Document No. 03-03-1201). Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
Bavon, A. (2001). The effect of the Tarrant County drug court project on recidivism. Evaluation and Program Planning, 24(1), 13-24.
Bell, M.M. (1998). King County Drug Court evaluation: Final report. Seattle, WA: Author.
Brewster, M.P. (2001). An evaluation of the Chester County (PA) Drug Court Program. Journal of Drug Issues, 31(1), 177- 206.
Brown, R. (2011). Drug Court effectiveness: A matched cohort study in the Dane County Drug Treatment Court. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 50(4), 191-201.
Carey, S.M., & Finigan, M.W. (2007). Indiana drug courts: Monroe County drug treatment court: Process, outcome, and cost evaluation. Portland, OR: NPC Research
Carey, S.M., Lucas, L.M., Waller, M.S., Lambarth, C.H., Linhares, R., Weller, J.M., & Finigan, M.W. (2009). Vermont drug courts: Rutland County adult drug court process, outcome, and cost evaluation (Final Report). Portland, OR: NPC Research.
Cheesman, F.L.II., Graves, S.E., Holt, K., Kunkel, T.L., Lee, C.G., & White, M.T. (2016). Drug court effectiveness and efficiency: Findings for Virginia. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 34(2), 143-169.
Crumpton, D., Brekhus, J., Weller, J., & Finigan, M. (2003). Cost analysis of Baltimore City, Maryland Drug Treatment Court. Portland, OR: NPC Research.
Deschenes, E.P., Cresswell, L., Emami, V., Moreno, K., Klein, Z., & Condon, C. (2001). Success of drug courts: Process and outcome evaluations in Orange County, California (Final Report). Long Beach: California State University Long Beach.
Einspruch, E.L., Jarvis, K.L, Waller, M.S., Mackin, J.R., Carey, S.M., Prins, C., & Officer, K. (2015). Randomized controlled trial of measure 57 intensive drug court for medium- to high-risk property offenders: process, interviews, costs, and outcomes. Portland, OR: NPC Research.
Ericson, R., Welter, S., & Johnson, T. L. (1999). Evaluation of the Hennepin County Drug Court. Minneapolis: Minnesota Citizens Council on Crime & Justice.
Fielding, J.E., Tye, G., Ogawa, P.L., Imam, I.J., & Long, A.M. (2002). Los Angeles County drug court programs: Initial results. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 23(3), 217-224.
Finigan, M.W., Carey, S.M., & Cox, A. (2007). The impact of a mature drug court over 10 years of operation: Recidivism and costs (Final Report). Portland, OR: NPC Research.
Goldkamp, J.S., & Weiland, D. (1993). Assessing the impact of Dade County's Felony Drug Court: Final report. Philadelphia: Crime and Justice Research Institute.
Goldkamp, J.S., Weiland, D., & Moore, J. (2001). The Philadelphia treatment court, its development and impact: The second phase (1998-2000). Philadelphia: Crime and Justice Research Institute.
Goldkamp, J.S., White, M D., & Robinson, J.B. (2001). Do drug courts work? Getting inside the drug court black box. Journal of Drug Issues, 31(1), 27-72.
Gottfredson, D.C., Coblentz, K., & Harmon, M.A. (1997). A short-term outcome evaluation of the Baltimore City Drug Treatment Court Program. Perspectives, Winter, 33-38.
Gottfredson, D.C., Najaka, S.S., Kearley, B.W., & Rocha, C.M. (2006). Long-term effects of participation in the Baltimore City Drug Treatment Court: Results from an experimental study. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2(1), 67-98.
Granfield, R., Eby, C., & Brewster, T. (1998). An examination of the Denver Drug Court: The impact of a treatment-oriented drug-offender system. Law & Policy, 20(2), 183-202.
Harrell, A., Roman, J., & Sack, E. (2001). Drug court services for female offenders, 1996–1999: Evaluation of the Brooklyn Treatment Court. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
Johnson, G.D., Formichella, C.M., & Bowers, D.A., Jr. (1998). Do drug courts work? An outcome evaluation of a promising program. Journal of Applied Sociology, 15(1), 44-62.
Kobus, K. (2009). Examining the impact of drug court participation for moderate and high risk offenders. Digital Scholarship@UNLV.
Krebs, C.P., Lindquist, C.H., Koetse, W., Lattimore, P.K. (2007). Assessing the long-term impact of drug court participation with generalized estimating equations. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 91(1), 57-68.
Latessa, E.J., Shaffer, D.K., & Lowenkamp C. (2002). Outcome evaluation of Ohio’s drug court efforts: Final report. Cincinnati, OH: University of Cincinnati, Center for Criminal Justice Research, Division of Criminal Justice.
Listwan, S.J., Borowiak, J., Latessa, E.J. (2008). An examination of Idaho’s felony drug courts: Findings and recommendations. Kent, OH: Kent State University, Department of Justice Studies, Institute for the Study and Prevention of Violence.
Listwan, S.J., & Latessa, E.J. (2003). The Kootenai and Ada County drug courts: Outcome evaluation findings (Final Report). Cincinnati: Center for Criminal Justice Research, University of Cincinnati.
Listwan, S.J., Shaffer, D.K., & Latessa, E.J. (2001). The Erie County drug court: Outcome evaluation findings.Cincinnati, OH: University of Cincinnati, Center for Criminal Justice Research.
Listwan, S.J., Shaffer, D.K., & Latessa, E.J. (2001). The Akron municipal drug court: Outcome evaluation findings. Cincinnati, OH: University of Cincinnati, Center for Criminal Justice Research.
Listwan, S.J., Sundt, J.L., Holsinger, A.M., & Latessa, E.J. (2003). The effect of drug court programming on recidivism: The Cincinnati experience. Crime & Delinquency, 49(3), 389-411.
Logan, T., Hoyt, W., & Leukefeld, C. (2001). Kentucky drug court outcome evaluation: Behaviors, costs, and avoided costs to society. Lexington: University of Kentucky, Center on Drug and Alcohol Research.
Mackin, J.R., Carey, S.M., Finigan, M.W., Lucas, L.M., Strong, S.E., & Waller, M.S. (2008). Prince George's County Circuit Court Adult Drug Court Outcome and Cost Evaluation. NPC Research: Portland, OR.
Mackin, J.R., Lucas, L.M., Lambarth, C.H., Waller, M.S., Herrera Allen, T., Carey, S.M., & Finigan, M.W. (2009). Wicomico County Circuit Court Adult Drug Treatment Court Program Outcome and Cost Evaluation. NPC Research: Portland, OR.
Mackin, J.R., Carey, S.M., Finigan, M.W., Lucas, L.M., Strong, S.E., & Waller, M.S. (2008). Harford County District Court Adult Drug Court outcome and cost evaluation. Portland, OR: NPC Research.
Mackin, J.R., Lucas, L.M., Lambarth, C.H., Waller, M.S., Carey, S.M., & Finigan, M.W. (2009). Baltimore City Circuit Court Adult Drug Treatment Court and Felony Diversion Initiative: Outcome and cost evaluation final report. NPC Research: Portland, OR.
Mackin, J.R., Lucas, L.M., Lambarth, C.H., Waller, M.S., Herrera Allen, T., Carey, S.M., & Finigan, M.W. (2010). Howard County District Court Drug Treatment Court Program Outcome and Cost Evaluation. NPC Research: Portland, OR.
Mackin, J.R., Lucas, L.M., Lambarth, C.H., Waller, M.S., Herrera Allen, T., Carey, S M., & Finigan, M.W. (2010). Montgomery County Adult Drug Court Outcome and Cost Evaluation. NPC Research: Portland, OR.
Mahaffy, K.A. (2006). Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas adult drug court: Outcome evaluation. Millersville, PA: Millersville University, Department of Sociology/Anthropology.
Marchand, G., Waller, M.S., & Carey, S.M. (2006). Barry County Adult Drug Court outcome and cost evaluation (Final Report). Portland, OR: NPC Research.
Marchand, G., Waller, M., & Carey, S.M. (2006). Kalamazoo County Adult Drug Treatment Court outcome and cost evaluation (Final Report). Portland, OR: NPC Research.
Martin, T.J., Spohn, C.C., Piper, R.K., & Frenzel-Davis, E. (2001). Phase III Douglas County Drug Court evaluation: Final report. Omaha, NE: Institute for Social and Economic Development.
Martinez, A.I., & Eisenberg, M. (2003). Initial process and outcome evaluation of drug courts in Texas. Austin, TX: Criminal Justice Policy Council.
Mayfield, J., Estee, S., Black, C., & Felver, B. (2013). Drug court outcomes: Outcomes of adult defendants admitted to drug courts funded by the Washington State Criminal Justice Treatment account. Olympia, WA: Washington State Dept. of Social & Health Services, Research & Data Analysis Division.
McNeece, C.A., & Byers, J.B. (1995). Hillsborough County Drug Court: Two-year (1995) follow-up study. Tallahassee: Florida State University, School of Social Work, Institute for Health and Human Services Research.
Miethe, T.D., Lu, H., & Reese, E. (2000). Reintegrative shaming and recidivism risks in drug court: Explanations for some unexpected findings. Crime & Delinquency, 46(4), 522-541.
Rempel, M., Green, M., & Kralstein, D. (2012). The impact of adult drug courts on crime and incarceration: Findings from a multi-site quasi-experimental design. Journal of Experimental Criminology. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.1007/s11292-012-9143-2.
Shanahan, M., Lancsar, E., Haas, M., Lind, B., Weatherburn, D., & Chen, S. (2004). Cost-effectiveness analysis of the New South Wales Adult Drug Court program. Evaluation Review, 28(1), 3-27.
Somers, J.M., Currie, L., Moniruzzaman, A., Eiboff, F., & Patterson, M. (2012). Drug treatment court of Vancouver: An empirical evaluation of recidivism. International Journal of Drug Policy, 230(5), 393-400.
Spohn, C., Piper, R.K., Martin, T., & Frenzel, E.D. (2001). Drug courts and recidivism: The results of an evaluation using two comparison groups and multiple indicators of recidivism. Journal of Drug Issues, 31(1), 149-176.
Stageberg, P., Wilson, B., & Moore, R.G. (2001). Final report on the Polk County Adult Drug Court. Des Moines: Iowa Department of Human Rights, Division of Criminal and Juvenile Justice Planning.
Truitt, L., Rhodes, W.M., Hoffman, N.G., Seeherman, A.M., Jalbert, S. K., Kane, M., . . . Finn, P. (2000). Phase I: Case studies and impact evaluations of Escambia County (Pensacola), Florida and Jackson County (Kansas City), Missouri drug courts. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates.
Turner, S., Greenwood, P., Fain, T., & Deschenes, E. (1999). Perceptions of drug court: How offenders view ease of program completion, strengths and weaknesses, and the impact on their lives. National Drug Court Institute Review, 2(1), 61-86.
Utah Substance Abuse and Anti-Violence Coordinating Council. (2001). Salt Lake County Drug Court outcome evaluation. Salt Lake City, UT: Author.
Vito, G.F., & Tewksbury, R.A. (1998). The impact of treatment: The Jefferson County (Kentucky) Drug Court Program. Federal Probation, 62(2), 46-51.
Weatherburn, D., Jones, C., Snowball, L., & Hua, J. (2008). The NSW drug court: A re-evaluation of its effectiveness (Crime and Justice Bulletin No. 121). Sydney, Australia: New South Wales Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research.
Wolfe, E., Guydish, J., & Termondt, J. (2002). A drug court outcome evaluation comparing arrests in a two year follow-up period. Journal of Drug Issues, 32(4), 1155-1171.