|Benefit-Cost Summary Statistics Per Participant|
|Taxpayers||($1,062)||Benefits minus costs||($3,503)|
|Participants||($1,609)||Benefit to cost ratio||n/a|
|Others||($646)||Chance the program will produce|
|Indirect||($186)||benefits greater than the costs||28 %|
|Net program cost||$0|
|Benefits minus cost||($3,503)|
|Meta-Analysis of Program Effects|
|Outcomes measured||Treatment age||No. of effect sizes||Treatment N||Adjusted effect sizes(ES) and standard errors(SE) used in the benefit - cost analysis||Unadjusted effect size (random effects model)|
|First time ES is estimated||Second time ES is estimated|
Any criminal conviction according to court records, sometimes measured through charges, arrests, incarceration, or self-report.
Alcohol use disorder
Clinical diagnosis of alcohol use disorder or symptoms measured on a validated scale.
Any employment, including part-time work.
Admission to a psychiatric ward or hospital.
A lack of stable housing, often measured through self-report of conditions like living on streets or in shelters in a given time period.
Emergency department visits
Whether someone visited the emergency department, or the number of times they visited the emergency department.
Mental health symptoms (such as symptoms of psychosis) in individuals with serious mental illness, measured on a validated scale.
|Detailed Monetary Benefit Estimates Per Participant|
|Affected outcome:||Resulting benefits:1||Benefits accrue to:|
|Crime||Criminal justice system||($429)||$0||($810)||($215)||($1,454)|
|Alcohol use disorder||Health care associated with alcohol abuse or dependence||($3)||($1)||($3)||($2)||($9)|
|Property loss associated with alcohol abuse or dependence||$0||$0||($1)||$0||($1)|
|Mortality associated with alcohol||$0||$0||$0||($5)||($5)|
|Employment||Labor market earnings||($698)||($1,640)||$0||$0||($2,338)|
|Hospitalization (psychiatric)||Health care associated with psychiatric hospitalization||($54)||($1)||($12)||($27)||($94)|
|Emergency department visits||Health care associated with emergency department visits||$123||$33||$180||$61||$398|
|Detailed Annual Cost Estimates Per Participant|
|Annual cost||Year dollars||Summary|
|Program costs||$0||2012||Present value of net program costs (in 2018 dollars)||$0|
|Comparison costs||$0||2012||Cost range (+ or -)||10 %|
Benefits Minus Costs
Benefits by Perspective
Taxpayer Benefits by Source of Value
|Benefits Minus Costs Over Time (Cumulative Discounted Dollars)|
|The graph above illustrates the estimated cumulative net benefits per-participant for the first fifty years beyond the initial investment in the program. We present these cash flows in discounted dollars. If the dollars are negative (bars below $0 line), the cumulative benefits do not outweigh the cost of the program up to that point in time. The program breaks even when the dollars reach $0. At this point, the total benefits to participants, taxpayers, and others, are equal to the cost of the program. If the dollars are above $0, the benefits of the program exceed the initial investment.|
Bright, J.I., Baker, K.D., & Neimeyer, R.A. ( 1999). Professional and paraprofessional group treatments for depression: a comparison of cognitive-behavioral and mutual support interventions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(4), 491-501.
Chinman, M.J., Rosenheck, R., Lam, J.A., & Davidson, L. (2000). Comparing consumer and nonconsumer provided case management services for homeless persons with serious mental illness. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 188(7), 446-453.
Clarke, G.N., Herinckx, H.A., Kinney, R.F., Paulson, R.I., Cutler, D.L., Lewis, K., & Oxman, E. (2000). Psychiatric hospitalizations, arrests, emergency room visits, and homelessness of clients with serious and persistent mental illness: findings from a randomized trial of two ACT programs vs. usual care.Mental Health Services Research, 2(3),155-164.
Eisen, S.V., Schultz, M.R., Mueller, L.N., Degenhart, C., Clark, J.A., Resnick, S.G., Christiansen, C.L., …, & Sadow, D. (2012). Outcome of a randomized study of a mental health peer education and support group in the VA. Psychiatric Services, 63(12), 1243-1246.
Felton, C.J., Stastny, P., Shern, D.L., Blanch, A., Donahue, S.A., Knight, E., & Brown, C. (1995). Consumers as peer specialists on intensive case management teams: Impact on client outcomes. Psychiatric Services, 46(10), 1037-1044.
Rivera, J.J., Sullivan, A.M., & Valenti, S.S. (2007). Adding consumer-providers to intensive case management: Does it improve outcome?. Psychiatric Services 58(6), 802-809.
Solomon, P. & Draine, J. (1995). The efficacy of a consumer case management team: 2-year outcomes of a randomized trial. Journal of Mental Health Administration, 22(2), 135-146.