|Benefit-Cost Summary Statistics Per Participant|
|Taxpayers||$187||Benefits minus costs||$390|
|Participants||$8||Benefit to cost ratio||$8.17|
|Others||$184||Chance the program will produce|
|Indirect||$66||benefits greater than the costs||64 %|
|Net program cost||($54)|
|Benefits minus cost||$390|
|Meta-Analysis of Program Effects|
|Outcomes measured||Treatment age||No. of effect sizes||Treatment N||Adjusted effect sizes(ES) and standard errors(SE) used in the benefit - cost analysis||Unadjusted effect size (random effects model)|
|First time ES is estimated||Second time ES is estimated|
Readmission to the hospital after discharge; typically within 30 days.
|Detailed Monetary Benefit Estimates Per Participant|
|Affected outcome:||Resulting benefits:1||Benefits accrue to:|
|Hospital readmissions||Health care associated with hospital readmissions||$187||$8||$184||$93||$472|
|Program cost||Adjustment for deadweight cost of program||$0||$0||$0||($27)||($27)|
|Detailed Annual Cost Estimates Per Participant|
|Annual cost||Year dollars||Summary|
|Program costs||$51||2014||Present value of net program costs (in 2018 dollars)||($54)|
|Comparison costs||$0||2014||Cost range (+ or -)||39 %|
Benefits Minus Costs
Benefits by Perspective
Taxpayer Benefits by Source of Value
|Benefits Minus Costs Over Time (Cumulative Discounted Dollars)|
|The graph above illustrates the estimated cumulative net benefits per-participant for the first fifty years beyond the initial investment in the program. We present these cash flows in discounted dollars. If the dollars are negative (bars below $0 line), the cumulative benefits do not outweigh the cost of the program up to that point in time. The program breaks even when the dollars reach $0. At this point, the total benefits to participants, taxpayers, and others, are equal to the cost of the program. If the dollars are above $0, the benefits of the program exceed the initial investment.|
Balaban, R.B., Weissman, J.S., Samuel, P.A., & Woolhandler, S. (2008). Redefining and redesigning hospital discharge to enhance patient care: a randomized controlled study. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 23(8), 1228-33.
Bostrom, J., Caldwell, J., McGuire, K., & Everson, D. (1996). Telephone follow-up after discharge from the hospital: does it make a difference? Applied Nursing Research: ANR, 9(2), 47-52.
Dudas, V., Bookwalter, T., Kerr, K.M., & Pantilat, S.Z. (2001). The impact of follow-up telephone calls to patients after hospitalization. The American Journal of Medicine, 9(111), 26-30.
Jack, B.W., Chetty, V.K., Anthony, D., Greenwald, J.L., Sanchez, G.M., Johnson, A.E., Forsythe, S.R., ... Culpepper, L. (2009). A reengineered hospital discharge program to decrease rehospitalization: a randomized trial. Annals of Internal Medicine, 150(3), 178-87.