|Benefit-Cost Summary Statistics Per Participant|
|Taxpayers||$1,232||Benefits minus costs||$2,137|
|Participants||$1,165||Benefit to cost ratio||$2.00|
|Others||$2,863||Chance the program will produce|
|Indirect||($991)||benefits greater than the costs||73%|
|Net program cost||($2,132)|
|Benefits minus cost||$2,137|
|Meta-Analysis of Program Effects|
|Outcomes measured||Treatment age||No. of effect sizes||Treatment N||Adjusted effect sizes(ES) and standard errors(SE) used in the benefit - cost analysis||Unadjusted effect size (random effects model)|
|First time ES is estimated||Second time ES is estimated|
Any criminal conviction according to court records, sometimes measured through charges, arrests, incarceration, or self-report.
Grade point average^
Non-standardized measure of student performance calculated across subjects.
Number or percentage of school days present in a given enrollment period.
|Detailed Monetary Benefit Estimates Per Participant|
|Affected outcome:||Resulting benefits:1||Benefits accrue to:|
|Crime||Criminal justice system||$815||$0||$2,203||$407||$3,425|
|Labor market earnings associated with high school graduation||$541||$1,270||$695||($270)||$2,235|
|Costs of higher education||($124)||($105)||($34)||($62)||($325)|
|Program cost||Adjustment for deadweight cost of program||$0||$0||$0||($1,066)||($1,066)|
|Detailed Annual Cost Estimates Per Participant|
|Annual cost||Year dollars||Summary|
|Program costs||$2,000||2015||Present value of net program costs (in 2018 dollars)||($2,132)|
|Comparison costs||$0||2015||Cost range (+ or -)||10%|
Benefits Minus Costs
Benefits by Perspective
Taxpayer Benefits by Source of Value
|Benefits Minus Costs Over Time (Cumulative Discounted Dollars)|
|The graph above illustrates the estimated cumulative net benefits per-participant for the first fifty years beyond the initial investment in the program. We present these cash flows in discounted dollars. If the dollars are negative (bars below $0 line), the cumulative benefits do not outweigh the cost of the program up to that point in time. The program breaks even when the dollars reach $0. At this point, the total benefits to participants, taxpayers, and others, are equal to the cost of the program. If the dollars are above $0, the benefits of the program exceed the initial investment.|
Heller, S.B., Shah, A.K., Guryan, J., Ludwig, J., Mullainathan, S., & Pollack, H.A. (2015). Thinking, fast and slow?: Some field experiments to reduce crime and dropout in Chicago (NBER Working Paper 21178). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.