|Benefit-Cost Summary Statistics Per Participant|
|Taxpayers||$1,500||Benefits minus costs||$5,996|
|Participants||$3,524||Benefit to cost ratio||$11.14|
|Others||$1,859||Chance the program will produce|
|Indirect||($296)||benefits greater than the costs||64 %|
|Net program cost||($591)|
|Benefits minus cost||$5,996|
|Meta-Analysis of Program Effects|
|Outcomes measured||Treatment age||No. of effect sizes||Treatment N||Adjusted effect sizes(ES) and standard errors(SE) used in the benefit - cost analysis||Unadjusted effect size (random effects model)|
|First time ES is estimated||Second time ES is estimated|
Standardized, validated tests of academic achievement.
|Detailed Monetary Benefit Estimates Per Participant|
|Affected outcome:||Resulting benefits:1||Benefits accrue to:|
|Test scores||Labor market earnings associated with test scores||$1,500||$3,524||$1,859||$0||$6,882|
|Program cost||Adjustment for deadweight cost of program||$0||$0||$0||($296)||($296)|
|Detailed Annual Cost Estimates Per Participant|
|Annual cost||Year dollars||Summary|
|Program costs||$583||2018||Present value of net program costs (in 2018 dollars)||($591)|
|Comparison costs||$0||2018||Cost range (+ or -)||40 %|
Benefits Minus Costs
Benefits by Perspective
Taxpayer Benefits by Source of Value
|Benefits Minus Costs Over Time (Cumulative Discounted Dollars)|
|The graph above illustrates the estimated cumulative net benefits per-participant for the first fifty years beyond the initial investment in the program. We present these cash flows in discounted dollars. If the dollars are negative (bars below $0 line), the cumulative benefits do not outweigh the cost of the program up to that point in time. The program breaks even when the dollars reach $0. At this point, the total benefits to participants, taxpayers, and others, are equal to the cost of the program. If the dollars are above $0, the benefits of the program exceed the initial investment.|
Borman, G.D., Benson, J.G., & Overman, L. (2008). A randomized field trial of the Fast ForWord language computer-based training program. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(1), 82-106.
Fuchs, L.S., Douglas, F., Carol, L.H., Sarah, R.P., Andrea, M.C., & Pamela, M.S. (2006). The effects of computer-assisted instruction on number combination skill in at-risk first graders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(5), 467-475.
Rouse, C.E., & Krueger, A.B. (2004). Putting computerized instruction to the test: a randomized evaluation of a “scientifically based” reading program. Economics of Education Review, 23(4), 323-338.
Slattery, C.A., & Widener University. (2003). The impact of a computer-based training system on strengthening phonemic awareness and increasing reading ability level.