|Benefit-Cost Summary Statistics Per Participant|
|Taxpayers||$2,341||Benefits minus costs||$7,297|
|Participants||$4,950||Benefit to cost ratio||$3.91|
|Others||$3,763||Chance the program will produce|
|Indirect||($1,252)||benefits greater than the costs||65 %|
|Net program cost||($2,505)|
|Benefits minus cost||$7,297|
|Meta-Analysis of Program Effects|
|Outcomes measured||Treatment age||No. of effect sizes||Treatment N||Adjusted effect sizes(ES) and standard errors(SE) used in the benefit - cost analysis||Unadjusted effect size (random effects model)|
|First time ES is estimated||Second time ES is estimated|
Grade point average^
Non-standardized measure of student performance calculated across subjects.
High school graduation
On-time completion of high school with a diploma (excluding GED attainment).
Office discipline referrals^
Referrals of a student to an administrative office for disciplinary reasons.
Number or percentage of school days present in a given enrollment period.
Alcohol use before end of middle school
Any use of alcohol by the end of middle school, typically by age 13.
Cannabis use before end of middle school
Any use of cannabis by the end of middle school, typically by age 13.
Any criminal conviction according to court records, sometimes measured through charges, arrests, incarceration, or self-report.
|Detailed Monetary Benefit Estimates Per Participant|
|Affected outcome:||Resulting benefits:1||Benefits accrue to:|
|Crime||Criminal justice system||$354||$0||$885||$177||$1,415|
|High school graduation||Labor market earnings associated with high school graduation||$2,356||$5,534||$3,031||$0||$10,921|
|Costs of higher education||($390)||($591)||($177)||($195)||($1,353)|
|Cannabis use before end of middle school||Health care associated with cannabis abuse or dependence||$21||$4||$22||$10||$57|
|Alcohol use before end of middle school||Property loss associated with alcohol abuse or dependence||$0||$1||$2||$0||$4|
|Mortality associated with alcohol||$0||$1||$0||$9||$10|
|Program cost||Adjustment for deadweight cost of program||$0||$0||$0||($1,253)||($1,253)|
|Detailed Annual Cost Estimates Per Participant|
|Annual cost||Year dollars||Summary|
|Program costs||$2,378||2016||Present value of net program costs (in 2018 dollars)||($2,505)|
|Comparison costs||$0||2016||Cost range (+ or -)||40 %|
Benefits Minus Costs
Benefits by Perspective
Taxpayer Benefits by Source of Value
|Benefits Minus Costs Over Time (Cumulative Discounted Dollars)|
|The graph above illustrates the estimated cumulative net benefits per-participant for the first fifty years beyond the initial investment in the program. We present these cash flows in discounted dollars. If the dollars are negative (bars below $0 line), the cumulative benefits do not outweigh the cost of the program up to that point in time. The program breaks even when the dollars reach $0. At this point, the total benefits to participants, taxpayers, and others, are equal to the cost of the program. If the dollars are above $0, the benefits of the program exceed the initial investment.|
Aseltine, R.H., Dupre, M., & Lamlein, P. (2000). Mentoring as a drug prevention strategy: An evaluation of Across Ages. Adolescent and Family Health 1(1), 11-20.
Blakely, C.H., Menon, R., & Jones, D.J. (1995). Project BELONG: Final report. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University, Public Policy Research Institute.
Buman, B., & Cain, R. (1991). The impact of short term, work oriented mentoring on the employability of low-income youth. Minneapolis, MN: Minneapolis Employment and Training Program.
Cave, G., & Quint, J. (1990). Career Beginnings impact evaluation: Findings from a program for disadvantaged high school students. New York, NY: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.
Hanlon, T.E., Bateman, R.W., Simon, B.D., O'Grady, K.E., & Carswell, S.B. (2002). An early community-based intervention for the prevention of substance abuse and other delinquent behavior. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31(6), 459-471.
Johnson, A. (1999). Sponsor-a-Scholar: Long-term impacts of a youth mentoring program on student performance. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research.
O'Donnell, C.R., Lydgate, T. & Fo, W.S.O. (1979). The Buddy System: Review and follow-up. Child Behavior Therapy, 1, 161-169.