|Benefit-Cost Summary Statistics Per Participant|
|Taxpayers||$376||Benefits minus costs||$2,225|
|Participants||$48||Benefit to cost ratio||$4.69|
|Others||$59||Chance the program will produce|
|Indirect||$2,346||benefits greater than the costs||75 %|
|Net program cost||($603)|
|Benefits minus cost||$2,225|
|Detailed Monetary Benefit Estimates Per Participant|
|Benefits from changes to:1||Benefits to:|
|Health care associated with falls||$376||$48||$59||$188||$670|
|Mortality associated with falls||$0||$0||$0||$2,459||$2,459|
|Adjustment for deadweight cost of program||$0||$0||$0||($301)||($301)|
|Detailed Annual Cost Estimates Per Participant|
|Annual cost||Year dollars||Summary|
|Program costs||$580||2016||Present value of net program costs (in 2018 dollars)||($603)|
|Comparison costs||$0||2016||Cost range (+ or -)||30 %|
|Estimated Cumulative Net Benefits Over Time (Non-Discounted Dollars)|
|The graph above illustrates the estimated cumulative net benefits per-participant for the first fifty years beyond the initial investment in the program. We present these cash flows in non-discounted dollars to simplify the “break-even” point from a budgeting perspective. If the dollars are negative (bars below $0 line), the cumulative benefits do not outweigh the cost of the program up to that point in time. The program breaks even when the dollars reach $0. At this point, the total benefits to participants, taxpayers, and others, are equal to the cost of the program. If the dollars are above $0, the benefits of the program exceed the initial investment.|
|Meta-Analysis of Program Effects|
|Outcomes measured||Treatment age||No. of effect sizes||Treatment N||Adjusted effect sizes(ES) and standard errors(SE) used in the benefit - cost analysis||Unadjusted effect size (random effects model)|
|First time ES is estimated||Second time ES is estimated|
Boongird, C., Keesukphan, P., Phiphadthakusolkul, S., Rattanasiri, S., & Thakkinstian, A. (2017). Effects of a simple home-based exercise program on fall prevention in older adults: A 12-month primary care setting, randomized controlled trial. Geriatrics & Gerontology International, 17, 2157-2163.
Duque, G., Boersma, D., Loza-Diaz, G., Hassan, S., Suarez, H., Geisinger, D., . . . Demontiero, O. (2013). Effects of balance training using a virtual-reality system in older fallers. Clinical Interventions in Aging, 8, 257.
Latham, N.K., Anderson, C.S., Lee, A., Bennett, D.A., Moseley, A., & Cameron, I.D. (2003). A randomized, controlled trial of quadriceps resistance exercise and vitamin D in frail older people: the Frailty Intervention Trial in Elderly Subjects (FITNESS). Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 51(3), 291–299.
Luukinen, H., Lehtola, S., Jokelainen, J., Väänänen-Sainio, R., Lotvonen, S., & Koistinen, P. (2007). Pragmatic exercise-oriented prevention of falls among the elderly: a population-based, randomized, controlled trial. Preventive medicine, 44(3), 265-271.
Vogler, C.M., Sherrington, C., Ogle, S.J., & Lord, S.R. (2009). Reducing risk of falling in older people discharged from hospital: a randomized controlled trial comparing seated exercises, weight-bearing exercises, and social visits. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 90(8), 1317-1324.