skip to main content
Washington State Institute for Public Policy

Use the search fields below to find specific publications that match certain criteria. If you want to find other information on our website that is not publications, you can use the search field in the navigation bar at the top, or click here to search the entire website.

Use the dropdown to select the field in which you would like to perform a keyword search.

Input the keyword you would like to search by in the textbox.

You can put multiple words inside quotes "like this" to indicate that you only want results where the entire phrase is found.

You can use the minus symbol "( - )" to indicate you only want results without the indicated word, such as: "teacher -substitute".


Select a publication author(s) to filter results by author. Once selected, you may remove an author from the search by clicking the "x".
"ANY of these authors" will return all results that include any of the authors you specified in your search criteria.

"ALL of these authors" will return only those results that include every author you specified in your search criteria.


Select a topic(s) to filter results by topic. Once selected, you may remove a topic from the search by clicking the "x".
"ANY of these topics" will return all results that include any of the topics you specified in your search criteria.

"ALL of these topics" will return only those results that include every topic you specified in your search criteria.


Select a date range if you would like to only see results published during a specified time period.

Publications

Found 623 results

The 1997 Revisions to Washington's Juvenile Offender Sentencing Laws: An Evaluation of the Effect of Local Detention on Crime Rates

Open Publication PDF

Steve Aos - July 2002

The Washington Legislature directed the Institute to evaluate the changes made during the 1997 session to the state's juvenile sentencing laws. One policy change in 1997 gave juvenile court judges more discretion to use county detention facilities for juvenile offenders not sentenced to the state. This report examines whether the use of detention affects juvenile crime rates. Cost-benefit estimates are also provided.

Related:

Preliminary Findings for the Juvenile Rehabilitation Administration’s Mentoring Program

Open Publication PDF

Robert Barnoski - July 2002

This report presents preliminary recidivism information on a mentoring program run by Washington State's Juvenile Rehabilitation Administration in the Seattle area.

Related:

Preliminary Findings for the Juvenile Rehabilitation Administration's Dialectic Behavioral Therapy Program

Open Publication PDF

Robert Barnoski - July 2002

This report presents preliminary recidivism information on Dialectic Behavior Therapy, a program run by Washington State's Juvenile Rehabilitation Administration. The program features comprehensive cognitive-behavioral treatment for individuals with complex and difficult-to-treat mental disorders.

Related:

Washington State's Implementation of Aggression Replacement Training for Juvenile Offenders: Preliminary Findings

Open Publication PDF

Robert Barnoski - June 2002

The 1996 Washington State Legislature appropriated $2.35 million to 12 juvenile courts for early intervention programs targeting youth placed on probation for the first time and considered at high risk to re-offend. At the request of the Juvenile Rehabilitation Administration, the Washington State Institute for Public Policy evaluated the program. The primary outcome measure is whether there is a reduction in subsequent court adjudications for youth in the program. This report also examines the level of program success necessary for the state's investment to be cost-effective.

Related:

The Learning Assistance Program: Options to Revise the State Funding Formula

Open Publication PDF

Barbara McLain, Marna Miller - June 2002

The 2001 Legislature directed the Institute to examine options for revising the state's funding formula for the Learning Assistance Program (LAP).  The report examines how state and federal dollars to assist struggling students (through state LAP and federal Title I programs) are allocated and spent by school districts.  It also analyzes the relationship between LAP, Title I, and student performance as measured by state test scores.  Three sample alternative funding formulas for LAP are offered for consideration. 

Related:

Washington School for the Deaf: Models of Education and Service Delivery

Open Publication PDF

Barbara McLain, Annie Pennucci - June 2002

The 2001 Washington State Legislature directed the Institute to examine educational delivery models for the Washington School for the Deaf.  This report covers issues influencing deaf education; characteristics of deaf and hard of hearing students in Washington; current models of providing education and services for deaf and hard of hearing students, including a comparison of models based on learning environment and cost; and possible alternative roles for WSD in education and service delivery. A literature review written by Susan Easterbrooks of Georgia State University is available above as an appendix. A companion study by the Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee is available at the JLARC website: http://www.leg.wa.gov/JLARC/AuditAndStudyReports/2002/Pages/02-8.aspx.

Related:

Smoking Cessation and Medicaid Expenditures: A Cost-Benefit Analysis

Open Publication PDF

Steve Lerch - June 2002

Tobacco use is a major cause of preventable illness and death.  In Washington State, nearly one-third of low-income adults, many of whom receive of state-funded medical care, are smokers.  To assess the feasibility of offering smoking cessation services through state medical assistance programs, this report examines the potential costs and benefits of providing such services to adults enrolled in the state’s Medicaid program. 

Related:

Kinship Care in Washington State: Prevalence, Policy, and Needs

Open Publication PDF

Jim Mayfield, Annie Pennucci, Courtney Lyon - June 2002

Kinship care is the full-time care of children by relatives, either informally (without the involvement of public child welfare agencies) or formally (when public child welfare agencies are involved in placing children with relatives). An estimated 32,000 children, or one out of 50 children in Washington State, are in kinship care. Based on surveys and interviews of relative caregivers and the experiences of other states, this report describes the prevalence, challenges, and needs of kinship caregivers in Washington State and provides policy options to address those needs. Also available are two technical appendices providing detail on the challenges and needs of kinship caregivers: (1) Kinship Care Needs Assessment: Focus Group Results. Prepared by the Social and Economic Sciences Research Center, Washington State University. (2) Washington State Relative Caregivers Survey: Final Analysis.

Related:

Implementation of Washington's Dangerous Mentally Ill Offender Law: Preliminary Findings

Open Publication PDF

Polly Phipps, Gregg Gagliardi - March 2002

In 1999, the Washington State Legislature enacted Substitute Senate Bill 5011 to improve the process of identifying and providing additional mental health treatment for mentally ill offenders being released from the Department of Corrections who pose a threat to public safety. This report focuses on the implementation of the Act and includes an assessment of how the process of defining, identifying, and selecting "dangerous mentally ill offenders" (DMIOs) has been carried out. The report also describes the treatment and services provided to an early group of released DMIOs.

Related:

Evaluation of the HOPE Act: New State Services for Street Youth: Second Interim Report, First Two Program Years

Open Publication PDF

Anita Kay - March 2002

In 1999, the Legislature created two new programs for street youth with no family support:  HOPE Centers and Responsible Living Skills Programs.  This second interim report focuses on program implementation issues, characteristics of youth served, and services provided during the first two program years.  It also previews the final report to be delivered by December 2002.

Related: