METAANALYSIS 
CITATIONS 

BenefitCost Summary Statistics Per Participant  

Benefits to:  
Taxpayers  $3,936  Benefits minus costs  $17,279  
Participants  $9,192  Benefit to cost ratio  $34.81  
Others  $4,905  Chance the program will produce  
Indirect  ($244)  benefits greater than the costs  98 %  
Total benefits  $17,790  
Net program cost  ($511)  
Benefits minus cost  $17,279  
Detailed Monetary Benefit Estimates Per Participant  
Benefits from changes to:^{1}  Benefits to:  

Taxpayers  Participants  Others^{2}  Indirect^{3}  Total 

Crime  $23  $0  $56  $11  $91 
Labor market earnings associated with test scores  $3,913  $9,192  $4,849  $0  $17,955 
Adjustment for deadweight cost of program  $0  $0  $0  ($256)  ($256) 
Totals  $3,936  $9,192  $4,905  ($244)  $17,790 
Detailed Annual Cost Estimates Per Participant  
Annual cost  Year dollars  Summary  

Program costs  $479  2013  Present value of net program costs (in 2018 dollars)  ($511) 
Comparison costs  $0  2013  Cost range (+ or )  10 % 
Estimated Cumulative Net Benefits Over Time (NonDiscounted Dollars) 
The graph above illustrates the estimated cumulative net benefits perparticipant for the first fifty years beyond the initial investment in the program. We present these cash flows in nondiscounted dollars to simplify the “breakeven” point from a budgeting perspective. If the dollars are negative (bars below $0 line), the cumulative benefits do not outweigh the cost of the program up to that point in time. The program breaks even when the dollars reach $0. At this point, the total benefits to participants, taxpayers, and others, are equal to the cost of the program. If the dollars are above $0, the benefits of the program exceed the initial investment. 
MetaAnalysis of Program Effects  
Outcomes measured  Treatment age  No. of effect sizes  Treatment N  Adjusted effect sizes(ES) and standard errors(SE) used in the benefit  cost analysis  Unadjusted effect size (random effects model)  

First time ES is estimated  Second time ES is estimated  
ES  SE  Age  ES  SE  Age  ES  pvalue  
High school graduation^{}  13  2  10463  0.045  0.022  18  0.045  0.022  18  0.045  0.040  
Test scores^{}  13  5  30857  0.093  0.041  13  0.093  0.041  17  0.093  0.023 
Bartik, T.J., & Lachowska, M. (2014). The effects of doubling instruction efforts on middle school students' achievement: Evidence from a mutiyear regressiondiscontinuity design (Working Paper 14205). Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
Cortes, K., Goodman, J., & Nomi, T. (2014). Intensive math instruction and educational attainment: Longrun impacts of doubledose algebra (Working Paper 20211). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Dougherty, S.M. (2015). Bridging the discontinuity in adolescent literacy?: Mixed evidence from a middle grades intervention. Education, Finance, and Policy, 10(2), 157192.
Fryer, R.G. (2011). Injecting successful charter school strategies into traditional public schools: Early results from an experiment in Houston (NBER Working Paper 17494). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Taylor, E. (2014). Spending more of the school day in math class: Evidence from a regression discontinuity in middle school. Journal of Public Economics, 117, 162181.